## Wise IAS

Lesson 7, Topic 4
In Progress

# Carbon Nitrogen Balance and Comparative Slaughter Method

Lesson Progress
0% Complete

### Carbon Nitrogen balance and Comparative Slaughter Methods:

• In indirect calorimetry, using respiratory exchange, heat production is estimated, and energy retention is calculated as the difference between metabolisable energy intake and heat production.
• An alternative approach is to estimate energy retention more directly and to calculate heat production by difference.
• The quantities of protein and fat stored can be estimated by carrying out a carbon and nitrogen balance trial â€“ that is, by measuring the amounts of these elements entering and leaving the body and so, by difference, the amounts retained.
• The energy retained can then be calculated by multiplying the quantities of nutrients stored by their calorific values.
• The procedure for calculating energy retention from carbon and nitrogen balance data is best illustrated by considering an animal in which storage of both fat and protein is taking place.

Carbon and Nitrogen Balance Technique: The carbon-nitrogen balance technique provides a direct method for estimating energy retention in animals by measuring changes in carbon and nitrogen content.

### Principle:

• The Carbon-Nitrogen balance study estimates energy retention by directly measuring the amounts of carbon and nitrogen entering and leaving the body through diet and excretion. The difference between the intake and excretion of these elements is used to calculate the quantities of protein and fat stored. Energy retention is then estimated by applying calorific values to these stored nutrients.
• In growing and fattening animals, the main forms of energy storage are protein and fat. While the body also contains carbohydrate reserves, these are relatively small and remain relatively constant. The technique involves conducting a balance trial in which the amounts of carbon and nitrogen entering and leaving the body are carefully measured. Nitrogen is primarily excreted in feces and urine, while carbon can leave the body through methane and carbon dioxide production. Therefore, the trial is typically conducted in a respiration chamber.

### Calculating Energy Retention:

• To estimate energy retention, one calculates the quantities of nutrients stored (protein and fat) in the body and then converting these quantities into energy values using their known calorific values.
• Protein is assumed to contain 16% nitrogen. The quantity of protein stored is calculated by multiplying the nitrogen balance by 100/16 (which equals 6.25). This provides an estimate of the protein stored.
• Protein also contains 51.2% carbon. Therefore, the amount of carbon stored as protein can be computed.
• The remaining carbon is stored as fat, which contains 74.6% carbon. Fat storage is calculated by multiplying the carbon balance (minus that stored as protein) by 100/74.6.
• The energy content of the stored protein and fat is then calculated using average calorific values for body tissues. The specific values can vary by species, but commonly used values are 9.37 Kcal per gram for fat and 5.32 Kcal per gram for protein in cattle and sheep.

Procedure: Animals are placed in a respiration chamber, where carbon dioxide and methane production can be measured accurately.

• Nitrogen is primarily excreted in feces and urine, while carbon leaves the body in methane, carbon dioxide, and other forms. Carbon and nitrogen intake through diet and the amounts excreted are carefully measured
• Nitrogen balance is calculated as the difference between intake and excretion of nitrogen. The quantity of protein stored is estimated by multiplying the nitrogen balance by 100/16 (since protein contains 16% nitrogen).
• Carbon balance is calculated, and the amount of carbon stored as protein is computed.

The remaining carbon is stored as fat, and fat storage is calculated by multiplying the carbon balance (minus that stored as protein) by 100/74.6.Energy content of stored protein and fat is calculated using calorific values for these nutrients.

1. Direct Measurement: The Carbon-Nitrogen balance technique provides a direct measurement of energy retention by quantifying the intake and excretion of carbon and nitrogen.
2. RQ not required: No measure of oxygen consumption (or RQ) is required.
3. Insight into Protein and Fat Deposition: Researchers can determine not only the total energy retained but also the proportions stored as protein and fat.
4. Estimation of Protein Utilization: Besides estimating energy retention, the technique can also be used to estimate protein utilization, which is valuable for assessing the protein quality of diets.

1. Complex Experimental Setup: Setting up a Carbon-Nitrogen balance study can be complex and requires specialized equipment, including respiration chambers for accurate measurement of gases like carbon dioxide and methane.
2. Skilled Personnel: The technique requires skilled personnel with expertise in animal physiology, nutrition, and analytical chemistry to accurately measure and interpret the data.
3. Expensive Equipment: Acquiring and maintaining the necessary equipment for measuring carbon and nitrogen intake and excretion can be costly.
4. Labor-Intensive: Carbon-Nitrogen balance studies are labor-intensive, requiring careful monitoring of animals, sample collection, and data analysis over an extended period. This can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

### Comparative Slaughter Method:

The Comparative Slaughter method is a valuable technique used to measure energy retention in growing and fattening animals, especially in poultry and pigs. This method involves slaughtering animals at the beginning and end of a trial and determining the changes in carcass composition and energy content.

Principle: Energy Gain Measurement: The primary goal of the Comparative Slaughter method is to measure the gain of energy by the animal in the form of protein and fat. It directly assesses the change in energy content of the animal’s body over a specific period.

• Assumption: The method is based on the assumption that the body composition of the experimental group of animals (e.g., birds or pigs) at the beginning of the experiment can be accurately predicted from the carcass compositions of comparable animals from the same population that are slaughtered at the beginning of the experimental period.

### Procedure:

1. Initial Slaughter: At the start of the trial, representative animals from each treatment group are selected and slaughtered. The carcasses are then analyzed for their composition, including dry matter, protein, and fat content. Energy content can also be calculated from the protein and fat data.
2. Experimental Period: The animals in the experimental groups are raised and fed according to the study protocol during a specific period, during which changes in body composition and energy retention are expected to occur.
3. Final Slaughter: At the end of the experimental period, animals from each treatment group are again slaughtered, and their carcasses are analyzed for composition and energy content.
4. Comparison: The changes in carcass composition and energy content between the initial and final slaughters are used to estimate energy retention in terms of protein and fat gain.

1. Accuracy: The Comparative Slaughter method provides accurate measurements of energy retention because it directly measures changes in body composition and energy content.
2. Precision: It can yield precise results, especially when the time interval between the initial and final slaughters is long, allowing for substantial weight changes.
3. Species Applicability: This method is suitable for chickens and pigs and is particularly valuable for these species in research and production settings.

### Challenges and Limitations:

1. Expense: The Comparative Slaughter method can be expensive, as it involves slaughtering animals, conducting carcass analyses, and calculating energy content.
2. Labor-Intensive: It is labor-intensive and requires skilled personnel for animal handling, carcass analysis, and data interpretation.
3. Sample Size: To obtain accurate results, a sufficiently large number of animals per treatment group is required. Smaller sample sizes may be prone to the influence of between-animal variation.
4. Time-Consuming: The method can be time-consuming, especially when a significant time interval is needed for substantial weight changes to occur.
5. Ethical Considerations: Slaughtering animals for research purposes raises ethical considerations related to animal welfare. Researchers must ensure compliance with ethical guidelines and regulations.

### Differences between Carbon-Nitrogen balance and Comparative Slaughter method :

1. Metabolic Information: Carbon-Nitrogen Balance Study provides detailed analysis of protein and fat storage by tracking carbon and nitrogen separately, estimating each nutrient individually while Comparative Slaughter method estimates total energy retention without distinguishing between protein and fat, focusing on overall body composition changes
2. Complexity and Equipment: The Carbon-Nitrogen balance study requires a respiration chamber and specialized equipment to measure gases and nutrient intake. The Comparative Slaughter method involves weighing animals and their carcasses, which is relatively simpler.
3. Sensitivity: The Carbon-Nitrogen balance study is more sensitive to small changes in nutrient utilization and may be better suited for studying metabolism in detail. The Comparative Slaughter method may be used for larger-scale assessments of energy retention.

### Practice Questions

1. Outline the Carbon-Nitrogen Balance method for determining protein and fat synthesis in animals. What are the key measurements taken, and how are they used to calculate energy retention?
Marks: 10
2. Discuss the significance of nitrogen balance data in estimating protein gain in animals. How does this method contribute to understanding animal growth and production?
Marks: 10
3. Explain the Comparative Slaughter Method and its application in animal nutrition research. What are the key steps involved, and how is energy retention determined using this method?
Marks: 10
4. Evaluate the practical applications and limitations of the Comparative Slaughter Method in determining the efficiency of energy use for growth and production in animals.
Marks: 10